What They Think About How They Are Evaluated: Perspectives of New York State Physical Educators on Teacher Evaluation Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2016v11n6a727Keywords:
assessment in physical education, teacher effectiveness, value-added modelsAbstract
While research on high stakes testing continues to expand, little is known regarding how the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers is affecting physical education (PE). A proportionate, stratified random sample of physical educators in New York State was drawn (n=489) to survey them about their district’s practices and their attitudes about the state’s new teacher evaluation policy. Results indicated that 38% of respondents were evaluated in part on the basis of results from written tests of students, while 27% indicated their district used student fitness tests for this purpose.  Eighteen percent of respondents reported their district used state mandated English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics test scores in calculating physical educator performance ranks. While few reported using performance-based measures, 94% of respondents indicated these as the preferred means of assessment in PE. Eighty-three percent of respondents predicted that the new teacher evaluation system would not improve PE.Downloads
Published
2016-12-13
How to Cite
Seymour, C. M., & Garrison, M. J. (2016). What They Think About How They Are Evaluated: Perspectives of New York State Physical Educators on Teacher Evaluation Policy. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2016v11n6a727
Issue
Section
Policy
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Clancy M Seymour, Mark J Garrison
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use after initial publication under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.